1. IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro De Geografia E Estatística. Censo Agropecuário: resultados definitivos. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2019.
2. ABIEC - Associação Brasileira das Indústrias Exportadoras de Carnes. Beef Report 2023: O Perfil da Pecuária no Brasil. São Paulo: ABIEC, 2023. 109p.
3. MAPA - Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Projeções do Agronegócio: Brasil 2020/21 a 2030/31, Projeções de Longo Prazo. Brasília: MAPA, 2021.101p.
4. USDA - United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, 2024.
5. GRISI, L. et al. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, v.23, n.2, p.150-156, 2014.
6. CALVANO, M.P.C.A. et al. Bioeconomic simulation of Rhipicephalus microplus infestation in different beef cattle production systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agricultural Systems, v.194, 103247, 2021.
7. BARROS, J.C. et al. Impacto econômico do carrapato-do-boi na pecuária em transformação no brasileconomic impact of the cattle tick on Brazilian livestock in transformation. Contemporary Journal, v.4, n.1, p.3266-3287, 2024.
8. NAVA, S. et al. Ticks of the southern cone of américa: diagnosis, distribution, and hosts with taxonomy, ecology and sanitary importance. 1ªed. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2017. 372p.
9. ONOFRIO, V.C. et al. Description of a new species of Ixodes (Acari: Ixodidae) and first report of Ixodes lasallei and Ixodes bocatorensis in Brazil. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v.11, n.4, p.101423, 2020.
10. MUÑOZ-LEAL, S. et al. A new species of soft tick from dry tropical forests of Brazilian Caatinga. Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases, v.12, n.5, p.1-9, 2021.
11. NUÑES, et al. Boophilus microplus, la garrapata comun del ganado vacuno. 1ªed. Buenos Aires: Hemisfério Sur, 1982. 19p.
12. VERÍSSIMO, C.J. et al. Resistência e suscetibilidade de bovinos leiteiros mestiços ao carrapato Boophilus microplus. Boletim Indústria Animal, v.54, n.2, p.1-10, 1997.
13. JONSSON, N.N. et al. Molecular biology of amitraz resistance in cattle ticks of the genus Rhipicephalus. Frontiers in Bioscience, v.23, n.2, p.796-810, 2018.
14. ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Controle estratégico dos carrapatos nos bovinos. In: ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Carrapatos na Cadeia Produtiva de Bovinos. 1ªed. Brasília: Embrapa, 2019. p.123-133.
15. GUGLIELMONE, A. A. et al. Ticks (Ixodidae) on humans in South America. Experimental and Applied Acarology, v.40, n.2, p.83-100, 2006.
16. RECK, J. et al. Does Rhipicephalus microplus tick infestation increase the risk for myiasis caused by Cochliomyia hominivorax in cattle? Preventive Veterinary Medicine, v.113, n.1, p.59-62, 2014.
17. ROCHA, U.R. Biologia e controle biológico do carrapato Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Boletim Técnico da Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias de Jaboticabal, n.3, p.1-32, 1984.
18. CRUZ, B.C. et al. Biological parameters for Rhipicephalus microplus in the field and laboratory and estimation of its annual number of generations in a tropical region. Parasitology Research, v.119, n.8, p.2421-2430. 2022.
19. RODRIGUES, V.S. Ecologia, sazonalidade e resistência a acaricidas de carrapatos em propriedades rurais do triângulo mineiro. 2022. 202f. Tese (Doutorado em Imunologia e Parasitologia Aplicadas), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
20. PEREIRA, C.M.; LABRUNA, M.B. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. In: PEREIRA, M.C. et al. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: Biologia, Controle e Resistência. 1ªed. São Paulo: MedVet, 2008. p.15-53.
21. GONZALES, J.C. et al. O ciclo parasitário do Boophilus microplus em bovinos estabulados. Arquivos da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária da UFRGS, v.2, p.25-34, 1974.
22. GAUSS, C.L.B.; FURLONG, J. Comportamento de larvas infestantes de Boophilus microplus em pastagem de Brachiaria decumbens. Ciência Rural, v. 32, n.3, p.467-472. 2002.
23. ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Control of Rhipicephalus microplus tick larvae in the field based on distancing from the host - Lone tick system. Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports v. 47, 100950, 2024.
24. GEORGE, J.E. et al. Acaricides for controlling ticks on cattle and the problem of acaricide resistance. In: BOWMAN, A.S.; NUTTALL, P.A. Ticks: Biology, Disease and Control. 1ªed. Cambridge: University Press, 2008. p.415-416.
25. BERTIN, F.R. et al. Arsenic toxicosis in cattle: meta-analysis of 156 cases. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, v.27, n.4, p.977-981, 2013.
26. GEORGE. J.E. et al. Chemical control of ticks on cattle and the resistance of these parasites to acaricides. Parasitology, v.129, Supl., p.353-366, 2004.
27. CASTRO-JANER E. et al. Diagnoses of fipronil resistance in Brazilian cattle ticks (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus) using in vitro larval bioassays. Veterinary Parasitology, v.173, n.3-4, p.300-306, 2010.
28. FURLONG, J.; PRATA, J.R.S. Resistência dos Carrapatos aos Carrapaticidas. 1ª ed. Juiz de Fora: Embrapa Gado de Leite, 2000. 25p.
29. ROUSH, R.T. Occurrence, genetics and management of insecticide resistance. Parasitology Today, v.9, n.5, p.174-179, 1993.
30. FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations. Ticks: acaricide resistance: diagnosis, management and prevention. In: FAO. Guidelines Resistance Management and Integrated Parasite Control in Ruminants, Rome: FAO, 2004. p.25-77.
31. MENDES, M.C. et al. Resistance to cypermethrin, deltamethrin and chlorpyriphos in populations of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) from small farms of State of São Paulo, Brazil. Veterinay Parasitology, v.178, n.3-4, p.383-88, 2011.
32. SINDAN - Sindicato Nacional da Indústria de Produtos para Saúde Animal. Compêndio de Produtos Veterinários SINDAN. 1ªed. São Paulo: MedVet, 2014. 12.227p.
33. FREITAS, D.R.J. et al. Caracterização da resistência para acaricidas no carrapato Boophilus microplus. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, v.33, n.2, p.109-117, 2005.
34. LI, X. et al. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annual Review of Entomology, v.52, p.231-253, 2007.
35. HEMINGWAY, J. et al. An overview of insecticide resistance. Science, v.298, n.5591, p.96-97, 2002.
36. PEREIRA, M.C. et al. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Biologia, Controle e Resistência). 1ºed. São Paulo: MedVet Livros, 2008. 169p.
37. MARTIN, T. et al. Oxidases responsible for resistance to pyrethroids sensitize Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to triazophos in West Africa. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, v.33, n.9, p.883-887, 2003.
38. LOVIS, L. et al. Distribution patterns of three sodium channel mutations associated with pyrethroid resistance in Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus populations from North and South America, South Africa and Australia. International Journal of Parasitology, v.2, p.216-224, 2012.
39. FUKUTO, T.R. Mechanism of action of organophophorus and carbamate insecticides. Environmental Health Perspectives, v.87, p.245-254, 1990.
40. RAMÍREZ, J.; LACASA, M. Plaguicidas: clasificación, uso, toxicologia y medición de la exposición. Archivos de Prevención de Riesgos Laborales, v.4, n.2, p.67-75, 2001.
41. ABDULLAHI, U.S. Acute organophosphorus compound poisoning in cattle: a case report. Nigerian Veterinary Journal, v.25, n.1, p.49-52, 2004.
42. ABBAS, R.Z. et al. Acaricide resistance in cattle ticks and approaches to its management: the state of play. Veterinary Parasitology, v.203, n.1-2, p.6-20, 2014.
43. TEMEYER, K.B. et al. Acetylcholinesterase of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus and Phlebotomus papatasi: gene identification, expression, and biochemical properties of recombinant proteins. Pesticide Biochemistry Physiology, v.106, n.3, p.118-123, 2013.
44. EVANS, P.D.; MAQUEIRA, B. Insect octopamine receptors: a new classification scheme based on studies of cloned Drosophila G-protein coupled receptors. Invertebrate Neuroscience, v.5, n.3-4, p.111-118, 2005.
45. CHEN, A.C. et al. Mutations in a putative octopamine receptor gene in amitraz-resistant cattle ticks. Veterinary Parasitology, v.148, n.3-4, p.379-383, 2007.
46. CORLEY, S.W. et al. Mutation in the RmβAOR gene is associated with amitraz resistance in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, v.110, n.42, p.16772-16777, 2013.
47. LI, A.Y. et al. Resistance to coumaphos and diazinon in Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) and evidence for the involvement of an oxidative detoxification mechanism. Journal of Medical Entomology, v.40, n.4, p.482-490, 2003.
48. SODERLUND, D.M.; BLOOMQUIST, J.R. Molecular mechanisms of insecticide resistance. In: TABASHNIK, B.E.; ROUSH, B.E. Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods. 1ªed. New York: Chapman & Hall, Icn. 1990. p.58-96.
49. HAYES, W.J. Pesticides Studied in Man. 1ªed. Londres: Willianms and Wilkins, 1982. p.75.
50. WAKELING, E.N. et al. Pyrethroids and their effects on ion channels. In: SOUNDARARAJAN, R.P. Pesticides - Advances in Chemical and Botanical Pesticides. Londres: IntechOpen, 2012. p.39-66.
51. HE, H. et al. Sequence analysis of the knockdown resistance-homologous regions of the para-type sodium channel gene from pyrethroid-resistance Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, v.36, n.5, p.539-543, 1999.
52. STONE, et al. Multiple mutations in the para-sodium channel gene are associated with pyrethroid resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus from the United States and Mexico. Parasite and Vectors, v.7, a.456, p.1-14, 2014.
53. DOMINGUES, L.N. et al. Survey of pyrethroid and organophosphate resistance in Brazilian field populations of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: detection of C190A mutation in domain II of the para-type sodium channel gene. Veterinary Parasitology, v.189, n.2-4, p. 327-32. 2012.
54. KIM, S.B.; GOODFELLOW, M. Streptomyces avermetilis sp. nov., nom. rev., a taxonomic home for the avermectin-producing streptomycetes. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, v.52, n.6, p.2011-2014, 2002.
55. WOLSTENHOLME, A.J. Glutamate-gated chloride channels. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, v. 287, n.48, p.40232-40238, 2012.
56. BLOOMQUIST, J.R. Toxicology, mode of action and target site-mediated resistance to insecticides acting on chloride channels. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, v.106, n.2, p.301-314, 1993.
57. SINDAN, 2018. https://sindan.org.br/
58. CHANDLER, G.T. et al. Fipronil effects on estuarine copepod (Amphiascus tenuiremis) development, fertility, and reproduction: a rapid life-cycle assay in 96-well microplate format. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, v.23, n.1, p.117-124, 2004.
59. TANNER, P.A. et al. Advances in the treatment of heartworm, fleas and ticks. Canine Practice, v.22, n.2-3, p.40-47, 1997.
60. JANER, E.C. et al. Mutations in Rhipicephalus microplus GABA gated chloride channel gene associated with fipronil resistance. Ticks and Tick. Borne Disease, v.10, n.4, p.761-765, 2019.
61. CRUZ, B.C. et al. Effects of fluazuron (2.5 mg/kg) and a combination of fluazuron (3.0 mg/kg) + abamectin (0.5 mg/kg) on the reproductive parameters of a field population of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus on experimentally infested cattle. Research in Veterinary Science, v.97, n.1, p.80-84, 2014.
62. WILLIAMS, H. et al. Fluralaner, a novel isoxiazoline, prevents flea (Ctenocephalides felis) reproduction in vitro and in a simulated home environment. Parasites and Vectors, v.7, a.275, p.1-6, 2014.
63. ROHDICH, N. et al. A randomized, blinded, controlled and multi-centered field study comparing the efficacy and safety of Bravecto (fluralaner) against Frontline (fipronil) in flea and tick-infested dogs. Parasites and Vectors, v.7, a.83, p.1-8, 2014.
64. DA COSTA, A.J. et al. First report of the efficacy of a fluralaner-based pour-on product (Exzolt® 5%) against ectoparasites infesting cattle in Brazil. Parasites and Vectors, v.16, n.1, a.336, p.1-20, 2023.
65. DRUMMOND, R.E.A. et al. Boophilus annulatus and B. microplus: laboratory Tests of Insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology, v.66, n.1, p.130-133, 1973.
66. SHAW, R.D. Culture of an organophosphorus-resistant strain of Boophilus microplus (Can.) and an assessment of its resistance spectrum. Bulletin Entomology Research, v.56, n.3, p.389-405, 1966.
67. KLAFKE, G.M. et al. Larval immersion tests with ivermectin in populations of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) from state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology, v.142, n.3-4, p.386-390, 2006.
68. HIGA, L.O.S. et al. Evaluation of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) resistance to different acaricide formulations using samples from Brazilian properties. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, v.25, n.2, p.163-171, 2016.
69. RODRIGUEZ-VIVAS, R.I. et al. Control integrado de garrapatas en la ganadería bovina. Ecosistemas e Recursos Agropecuarios, v.1, n.3, p.295-308, 2014.
70. ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Proposta de controle de carrapatos para o Brasil Central em sistemas de produção de bovinos associados ao manejo nutricional no campo. Campo Grande: Embrapa Gado de Corte, 2016. 34p.
71. CALVANO, M.P.C.A. et al. Economic efficiency of Rhipicephalus microplus control and effect on beef cattle performance in the Brazilian Cerrado. Experimental and Applied Acarology, v.79, n.3-4, p.459-471, 2019.
72. BONATTE JR, P.B. et al. Economic performance evaluation of Brangus and Nellore cattle breed naturally infested with Rhipicephalus microplus in an extensive production system in Central-West Brazil. Experimental and Applied Acarology, v.78, n.4, p.565-577, 2019.
73. ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Advances in tick vaccinology in Brazil: from gene expression to immunoprotection. Frontiers in Bioscience-Scholar, v.10, n.1, p.127-142. 2018.
74. ALVES, S.B. Controle Microbiano de Insetos. 2ªed. Piracicaba: Fealq, 1998. 1163p.
75. FERNANDES, E.K.K.; BITTENCOURT, V.R.E.P. Entomopathogenic fungi against South American tick species. Experimental and Applied Acarology, v.46, n.1-4, p.71-93, 2008.
76. WANZALA, W; OGOMA, S.B. Chemical composition and mosquito repellency of essential oil of tagetes minuta from the southern slopes of mount elgonin western kenya. Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants, v.16, n.2, p.216-232, 2013.
77. CARVALHO, A.C.B. et al. Aspectos da legislação no controle dos medicamentos fitoterápicos. T&C Amazônia, v.5, n.11, p.26-32, 2007.
78. MULLA, M.S.; SU, T. Activity and biological effects of nim products against arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association, v.15, n.2, p.133-152, 1999.
79. BARROS, J.C. et al. Óleo essencial de Tagetes minuta como fitoterápico no controle dos carrapatos. In: ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Carrapatos na Cadeia Produtiva de Bovinos. 1ªed. Brasília: Embrapa, 2019. p.169-180.
80. VIEGAS JUNIOR, C. Terpenos com atividade inseticida: uma alternativa para o controle químico de insetos. Química Nova, v.26, n.3, p.390-400, 2003.
81. GARCIA, M.V. et al. Chemical identification of Tagetes minuta Linnaeus (Asteraceae) essential oil and its acaricidal effect on ticks. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, v.21, n.4, p.405-411, 2012.
82. ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Protective action of Tagetes minuta (Asteraceae) essential oil in the control of Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae) in a cattle pen trial. Veterinary Parasitology, v.197, n.1-2, p.341-345, 2013.
83. HIGA, L.O.S. et al. Effect of nootkatone on the in vitro mortality of the ticks Rhipicephalusmicroplus and Amblyomma sculptum (Acari: Ixodidae). International Journal of Acarology, v.49, n.2, p.147-153, 2023.
84. CSORDAS, B.G. et al. Molecular characterization of the recombinant protein RmLTI-BmCG-LTB: Protective immunity against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. PloS One, v.13, n.2, p.e0191596, 2018.
85. ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Cattle tick infestation in Brangus cattle raised with Nellore in central Brazil. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v.39, n.3, p.1099-1113, 2018.
86. WILLADSEN, P. et al. Immunologic control of a parasitic arthropod. Identification of a protective antigen from Boophilus microplus. Journal of Immunology, v.143, n.4, p.1346-1351, 1989.
87. RAPPUOLI, R. Reverse vaccinology. Current Opinion in Microbiology, v.3, n.5, p.445-450, 2000.
88. RODRÍGUEZ MALLÓN, A. et al. Functional and mass spectrometric evaluation of an anti-tick antigen based on the P0 peptide conjugated to Bm86 protein. Pathogens, v.9, n.6, p.513, 2020.
89. GIACHETTO, P.F. et al. Gene expression in the salivary gland of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus fed on tick-susceptible and tick-resistant hosts. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, v.9, a.477, p.1-15, 2020.
90. CHAUVIN, A. et al. Babesia and its hosts: adaptation to long-lasting interactions as a way to achieve efficient transmission. Veterinary Research, v.40, n.2, p.1-18, 2009.
91. BOCK, R. et al. Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology, v.129, n.1, p.247-269, 2004.
92. VIDOTTO, O. et al. Frequência de anticorpos contra Babesia bigemina, B. bovis e Anaplasma marginale em rebanhos leiteiros da região de Londrina, Paraná. Arquivos Brasileiros de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, v.49, n.5, p.655-659, 1997.
93. BOCK, R.E. et al. Effect of breed of cattle on transmission rate and innate resistance to infection with Babesia bovis and B. bigemina transmitted by Boophilus microplus. Australian Veterinary Journal, v.77, n.7, p.461-464, 1999.
94. BARROS, C.S.L. et al. Doenças do Sistema Nervoso de Bovinos no Brasil. 1ªed. Montes Claros: Agnes, 2006. p.87-95.
95. MARTINS, K.R. et al. Seasonal fluctuations of Babesia bigemina and Rhipicephalus microplus in Brangus and Nellore cattle reared in the Cerrado biome, Brazil. Parasites Vectors, v.15, a.395, p.1-9, 2022.
96. RISTIC, M. Anaplasmosis. In: Diseases of Cattle in the Tropics: Economic and Zoonotic Relevance. 1ªed. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1981. p.327-344.
97. DREHER, U.M. et al. Seroprevalence of anaplasmosis among cattle in Switzerland in 1998 and 2003: no evidence of an emerging disease. Veterinary Microbiology, v.107, n.1-2, p.71-79, 2005.
98. SMITH, R.D. et al. Babesiosis (Babesia bovis) stability in unstable environments. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v.916, n.1, p.510-520, 2000.
99. SUAREZ, C.E.; NOH, S. Emerging perspectives in the research of bovine babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Veterinary Parasitology, v.180, n.1-2, p.109-125, 2011.
100. SANTOS, L.R. et al. Tristeza Parasitária Bovina - Medidas de controle atuais. In: ANDREOTTI, R. et al. Carrapatos na Cadeia Produtiva de Bovinos. 1ªed. Brasília: Embrapa, 2019. p.87-99.
101. CRIADO-FORNELIO, A. A review of nucleic acid-based diagnostic tests for Babesia and Theileria, with emphasis on bovine piroplasms. Parasitology, v.49, n.1, p.39-44, 2007.
102. PICOLOTO, G. et al. Real time polymerase chain reaction to diagnose Anaplasma marginale in cattle and deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus leucogaster) of the Brazilian Pantanal. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, v.19, n.3, p.186-188, 2010.
103. OURA, C.A.L. et al. Application of a reverse line blot assay to the study of haemoparasites in cattle in Uganda. International Journal for Parasitology, v.34, n.5, p.603-613, 2004.
104. KIM, C. et al. Development of TaqMan-based real-time PCR assays for diagnostic detection of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, v.77, n.5, p.837-841, 2007.
105. HOLMAN, P.J. et al. Comparative infectivity of Babesia divergens and a zoonotic Babesia divergens-like parasite in cattle. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, v.73, n.5, p.865-870, 2005.
106. ZINTL, A. et al. Babesia divergens, a bovine blood parasite of veterinary and zoonotic importance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, v.16, n.4, p.622-636, 2003.
107. RODRIGUEZ, R.I.; TREES, A.J. In vitro responsiveness of Babesia bovis to imidocarb dipropionate and the selection of a drug-adapted line. Veterinary Parasitology, v.62, n.1-2, p.35-41, 1996.
108. COETZEE, J.F.; APLEY, M.D. Efficacy of enrofloxacin against severe experimental Anaplasma marginale infections in splenectomized calves. Veterinary Therapeutics, v.7, n.3, p.319, 2006.
109. REINBOLD, J.B. et al. Detection of Anaplasma marginale and A. phagocytophilum in bovine peripheral blood samples by duplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v.48, n.7, p.2424-2432, 2010.
110. WODAJE, A. et al. A review on bovine babesiosis. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences, v.6, n.1, p.63-70, 2019.
111. DE LA FUENTE, J. et al. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of North American isolates of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiaceae: Ehrlichieae). Veterinary Parasitology, v.97, n.1, p.65-76, 2001.
112. VIDOTTO, O. et al. Evaluation of a frozen trivalent attenuated vaccine against babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Brazil. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v.849, n.1, p. 420-423, 1998.
113. MIRABALLES, C. et al. Efficacy of frozen and refrigerated vaccines against bovine tick fever. Veterinaria, v.54, n.209, p.10-17, 2018.
114. KESSLER, R.H. et al. Tristeza parasitária dos bovinos: quando vacinar é preciso. 1ªed. Campo Grande: Embrapa Gado de Corte, 2002. 27p.
115. SACCO, A.M.S. Profilaxia da Tristeza Parasitária Bovina: Por quê, quando e como fazer. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 2002. 12p.
116. PURNELL, R.E. et al. Quinuronium sulphate for the treatment of Babesia divergens infections of splenectomised calves. The Veterinary Record, v.108, n.25, p.538-539, 1981.
117. KOCAN, K.M. Targeting ticks for control of selected hemoparasitic diseases of cattle. Veterinary Parasitology, v.57, n.1-3, p.121-151, 1995.